joensa.blogg.se

1. Openwall wordlists dictionary wep wpa wpa2 cracked#
2. Openwall wordlists dictionary wep wpa wpa2 drivers#
3. Openwall wordlists dictionary wep wpa wpa2 full#
4. Openwall wordlists dictionary wep wpa wpa2 password#

And of course aircrack (cpu) might as well be standing still.

Pyrit is slow, so you're not going to get the numbers from even multiple GPUs that I pull on a single GPU core in HC.

So if you have a list/ruleset that finds 30% of the hashes, but is 1000% more efficient (less keyspace) than the one that gets 40% you sacrifice the 10%, at least initially and use the rules for the extra 10% at the end. The trick is efficiency, not maximum results when it comes to WPA. If you find a rule or list working well on MD5 hashes it will likely perform will on WPA. personal pws and WPA PSK, but the patterns can apply across both. The solution to this is to stick with MD5. And 10 handshakes doesn't tell you squat, so even with a cluster of cracking rigs it takes forever to do quantitive analysis on WPA. If can take a day just to test 10 handshakes against a few new rules, whereas you could test the same MD5 hashes in under 10 seconds. This is the part where it is tough, because WPA is slow. To start getting results above 30-40% on WPA you'll need to start doing a lot of testing and analysis. You'll rarely find someone who is willing to share a list or rules that are working amazing because it takes a ton of time and work and you lose your edge in competitions and such.

Openwall wordlists dictionary wep wpa wpa2 password#

If you want to do more than just try to crack a single password then you're going to have to do it on GPU. But this list is bad for a source list for WPA just because of its size, you can't make more than a few mutations from it and still be able to test the results against a large enough sample to learn anything. If you don't have a GPU with fast hasing then stick to a good small list of PWs, not just a big source list of words and such. I get about 400,000 c/s on WPA and 28G c/s on MD5. For comparison, I can run this list in around 40 minutes. Add in just a few rules and you're talking nearly a month. Otherwise it will take you several days running nonstop to check the list as-is and you'll be lucky to have more than a 10-20% success rate. If you're using a CPU then this list isn't for you, just still with the openwall list or something under 5 to 10M words. I would call this list more of a list of last resort instead of a first choice. I have lists 10% of the size that do 400% better on average. This list is just too big to run a comprehsive ruleset on for WPA, and just using it for source words is pretty bad. If you were focusing on a single newtwork for a long time you could definetly expand it, but nothing like you can do when you can get 28G c/s on MD5. On a list this large the best you're going to do in volume is all lower, upper first character and all upper. That means to have "decent" success you'll need to apply rules to it to toggle case. So this list at best is only a "source list", not a cracking list. There isn't a single mixed case word I saw while tailing off samples of it while it was sorting the few dupes it contained. But that doesn't mean this list isn't rubbish because it is. It had only 300k worth of dupes in it, less than 0.001%.

Openwall wordlists dictionary wep wpa wpa2 full#

Let me save you some time.įirst off, this is not full of dupes as someone suggested. I can tell there are a lot of cracking newbs in this thread and just some newbs in general.

Openwall wordlists dictionary wep wpa wpa2 drivers#

BT5 has the ability to use CUDA and OpenCL drivers too, but they don't work on my POS laptop, but just a heads up, you can crack with the 13gb list if you split it into chunks and run them in parallel too if you've got more than one GPU.

Openwall wordlists dictionary wep wpa wpa2 cracked#

That 9+GB sequential list probably would have cracked in an hour or so. If I had it on my home machine and I sent the pcap to the hashcat site,I could have made a file compatible for cracking using oclhashcat on my GPU. So is sort if you want to sort unique or also, reverse the order of the list like say 1,2,3,4,5 becomes 5,4,3,2,1 (but with say a list of characters 8 or longer). Now that said, had I had to go and use the entire 9GB file, well, it would have done it, but would have had to run for days to go through all 8 characters, then all 9 until it found it. I just did a head and a tail on the files, till I found which one I knew it was in, and it cracked in like 20 minutes on a crappy dual core laptop with BT5. Cracked the wifes wifi(which I already knew the range it was in since I told her that her boss was an idiot for using just numbers and only as long as 9 characters). I made a 9+gb sequential numbers 00000000-999999999 file and aircrack used it fine, but I do see your issue, it would take days to crack something, so I used the linux split command (Read the help file) and made like a shit ton of 50mb files.